Comments on: Unity vs. Godot Engine: Performance and Community Comparison

By: Cynic

Cynic — Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:27:34 +0000

Unity (and people who use) always were and will be a mark of low quality.

By: Seeker

Seeker — Sun, 10 Apr 2022 20:59:20 +0000

Unity used to have a slew of little games made by beginers (and their quality wasn’t exactly stellar). I still recall people saying that “made in unity” was a mark of low quality.

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:14:49 +0000

There is one big disadvantage on GoDot : Lack of console support due to open source and as it is no cooperate.

There are porting Services like Lone Wolf Technologies – but this cost up from 3000 – 5000 USD per title.

I really like some concepts of GoDot and i hope they find a better solution for this in the future (would be great).

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 30 Dec 2021 12:56:19 +0000

The article keeps mentioning specifically Godot as freeware, but its no more or less freeware than Unity is?. Maybe they meant to write Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)? (see eg. wikipedia -> Freeware for differences).
With FOSS software, you can even legally make changes to the game engine itself, should you wish. That is not implied by a Freeware license (like Acrobat Reader for example).

Article mentions this:
“It uses the MIT License, which basically means the developer has to include the copyright of MIT within their project.”

Probably just a ambiguous sentence, but YOUR project isn’t under any license; You chose that license yourself. But when you distribute the “game-engine binary” along with your own project (which you do), you must simply include the TEXT of the MIT license, somewhere in the docs.

By: J

Tue, 21 Dec 2021 01:14:30 +0000

For Unity, you won’t need a unity license for mobile. Only switch, Xbox (non-developer mode), PlayStation, and stadia. All of the references to Pro and mobile on their site are just shoddy design trying to appeal to the Zynga types.